Artificial Intelligence, Emerging Technology
October 22, 2020
AI, Neuralink, and the Evolution of Human-Machine Interfaces
Fast forward to more recent times where people use more sophisticated tools in the form of computer systems. Even these modern digital tools required people to manipulate them though physical inputs (mice and keyboards) and observe the feedback through an externally observable output (monitors). This paradigm of the directly physical Human-Machine interfaces began to change in the past few decades with the rise of Artificial Intelligence (AI) capabilities.
AI has introduced an era where computers are able to not only work through direct physical manipulation, but where the tools themselves are able to observe and make predictions about a user’s intent. For example, computer vision systems record peoples’ natural kinesthetic body movements and gestures, use AI to interpret those gestures into requested actions (input) and display the results on a screen (for example scrolling through a menu). These systems still rely on some physical input from users, although there is not the same direct physical connection. Digital assistants such as Apple’s Siri, Amazon’s Alexa or Google’s Home similarly require a physical input, although a very light touch in the form of a breath of air for a voice command.
On August 28, 2020 Elon Musk and the Neuralink team presented a live demonstration of Neuralink’s latest experimental technology – a device which can be implanted in a skull to both read signals as well as introduce electrical impulses into the outer cortex of a brain. In the presentation, Neuralink showed a video of a pig with a Neuralink implant walking on a treadmill. Predictive algorithms attempted to determine the test-subject pig’s position and motion with surprising accuracy. Although early in development, this technology offers a view into a possible future where the tools of our digital world no longer require physical manipulation for an input or an externally observable output. It is an interesting world to imagine in my mind’s eye – even as I type this observation out on my physical keyboard.
Seth Brooks is a Vice President in FCAT.References & Disclaimers
1 See Neuralink Progress Update, Summer 2020, available at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DVvmgjBL74w
948978.1.0
Related posts
Q&A with Andrew J. Scott, PhD, Co-author, “The New Long Life”
SOPHIA MOWLANEJAD
January 14, 2021
FCAT hosts an ongoing Speaker Series as part of its mission to “bring the outside in” and share diverse perspectives with Fidelity associates to provoke conversation and action. A few weeks ago, as part of that series, the FCAT Research team hosted a presentation by Lynda Gratton and Andrew J. Scott, authors of “The New Long Life.” Their book suggests that we live in an age where technology has not been matched by the necessary innovation to social structures. After the presentation, FCAT socio-cultural researcher Sophia Mowlanejad caught up with Andrew, a Professor of Economics at London Business School and consulting scholar at Stanford University's Center on Longevity, on steps we can take to improve our financial planning.
Life and Work Through the Anthropological Lens: A Q&A with Gillian Tett of the Financial Times
John Dalton
February 3, 2022
FCAT recently hosted a presentation by Gillian Tett, Chair of the Editorial board and Editor-at-Large, US, of the Financial Times. Her recent book, “Anthro-Vision: A New Way to See in Business and Life”, has just been published. Following her presentation, FCAT’s John Dalton caught up with Gillian to ask a few additional questions on how anthropology can be used effectively in navigating business and social trends.
Technology & Society, Artificial Intelligence
Can a Machine Be Moral? A Q&A with Jean-Francois Bonnefon
Sarah Hoffman
April 13, 2022
FCAT recently hosted a presentation by psychologist and author Jean-Francois (JF) Bonnefon on his latest book, “The Car That Knew Too Much”. The book discusses a groundbreaking experiment, the Moral Machine, that allowed millions of people from over 200 countries and territories to make choices about life-and-death dilemmas posed by driverless cars. Should they sacrifice passengers for pedestrians? Save children rather than adults? Kill one person so many can live? Following his presentation, FCAT’s Sarah Hoffman caught up with JF to ask a few additional questions about this largest experiment in moral psychology.